Hmmmm......

Well, after reviewing the blogs of my fellow classmates, I feel less guilty about not updating my blog more frequently. I have greater than one blog entry. That's a start! What? What's that you say? I shouldn't be comparing myself to others, and the assignment outline details that I should be updating at least once a week? Rubbish!

Just kidding. Please don't hurt me.

Anyways, the midterm is fast approaching, and proofs will be the death of me. Upon reviewing last year's assignment and midterm, I feel fairly confident. But proofs with multiple quantifiers still confound me. Unfortunately, the assignment this year is one that I find (personally) more difficult to parse than last year's version.  My way of approaching proofs with multiple quantifiers, with variables appearing in the statement out of the order in which they have been quantified, is to first pray that it's an epsilon delta proof, and then to assess which variable comes first (epsilon or delta). Whichever variable appears second "wins". That is my only approach. THE END.


... Okay clearly that will not help me. But one can dream.

Claim 1.2 appears to be very similar to a delta epsilon proof. However, the quantifiers are placed out of order, so I'm a little lost

I will update as soon as I figure out what I am doing with my life.